Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Browse by Tag

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

The Many Personalities of Today's B2B Teleprospector

  
  
  
  

When I began my career in B2B sales and marketing, I was hired by a Canadian company to sell software to insurance companies based in the United States. They set me up in a remote office and provided me with everything I needed to sell a lot of licenses: Solution Selling training, a Goldmine CD, a thick binder of product brochures and datasheets, and an experienced sales manager who used to sell paper forms to insurance companies (before computers made that business obsolete).

What I did not have, and cannot imagine selling without today, was the support of a teleprospecting organization to qualify leads before I called on them. I was hard-rock mining, cold calling from sunup to sundown. The only marketing leads I had came from the few industry events we sponsored each year.

We’ve come a long way. Today, teleprospecting is an essential part of B2B demand creation strategies. Teleprospecting professionals are an impressive group, constantly adapting to changes in how companies buy, and utilizing new technology to be smarter about what they do. They’ve taken on new personalities in an ongoing effort to meet the growing demands of the role.

Let’s look at three personalities that are a modern take on traditional teleprospecting roles, including:

  • The First Responder. Field marketing teams promote several high-value offers at any given time through inbound channels like search marketing or content syndication. Any response to these offers (e.g. free trials, implementation best practices ebook targeting buyers in the later stages of the buying cycle) triggers a route around normal lead scoring and routing and is delivered directly to the inbound teleprospecting queue for immediate followup. The teleprospector knows that an inbound response to one of these offers is a great indicator of need or propensity to buy. More importantly, following up quickly, often within minutes, is the best way to establish a positive perception in the mind of a buyer, who may be in exploratory mode figuring out what to do next.
  • The (Social) Networker. When I started my B2B sales and marketing career as a quota-carrying software sales rep nearly 15 years ago, I was handed a thick A.M. Best directory of all the insurance companies operating in North America, complete with a list of top executives. The prospecting tools available to sales reps today are a little more advanced. Teleprospecting reps in particular are very savvy at mining social networks to uncover new leads. The best ones are all over LinkedIn and other professional networks, keeping tabs on who moves where. They join special interest groups, monitor conversations in these communities and reach out through networking tools to make first contact with targeted prospects. It's a learned skill, and many teleprospecting reps are now quite expert at leveraging social channels to generate new demand.
  • The Field Nurse. The field nurse excels in the high-stress environment of an inbound call center, where there’s no time to prepare and no two calls are alike. It’s fast-paced, and it’s reactive. All inbound calls, email requests and click-to-chat sessions are routed to inbound teleprospecting in real time and immediately prioritized over other prospecting activities. As might be expected, teleprospectors with exceptional verbal and written communication skills and the ability to think and act quickly will excel here. Each inbound conversation is different, so teleprospectors require broad knowledge and customer-service-like training to triage each request.

The practical question now is to see if companies start to formalize these personalities into distinct roles, giving even greater focus to the teleprospecting function. In another post, I’ll explore four more emerging teleprospecting personalities, and ask the question: ”are these teleprospecting personality traits the harbinger of role specialization, or an omen of problems to come?”

Comments

Jason, 
 
 
 
Great topic. This is a central issue that every company investing in Lead Generation is working to tackle. What is the role and mix of outbound inquiry generation and inbound lead development? 
 
 
 
We don't have industry standard terms to rely upon and that adds to the confusion. I propose the following terms for the distinct roles involved and wanted to get your thoughts: 
 
 
 
Demand Generation Rep (DGR) - Outbound and social media (LinkedIn) propectors.  
 
 
 
Lead Development Rep (LDR) - Develop leads through 1:1 nuruturing, build rapport, establish qualification, and acceptance of a next step with sales. 
 
 
 
From a practical standpoint I have found that most my clients have the LDR role spend part of their time in the outbound DGR role. This is mainly due to the difficulty of managing a steady flow of inbound inquiries from demand generation programs.  
 
 
 
Thanks, 
 
Vince
Posted @ Tuesday, January 31, 2012 4:07 PM by Vince Koehler
Hi Jason! Congrats on a terrific article! As an advisor and trainer to lead gen/dev organizations, I can confirm the three roles you identify. 
 
 
 
When a company's lead process is well-defined and mutually agreed between marketing and sales, the role distinctions are clear and reps can do quite well. When the process is ill-defined or absent, the roles get muddled and reps often are miscast. Results suffer. 
 
 
 
Another element to consider: many lead gen/dev functions still operate in "legacy" mode, with overemphasis on call counts and talk-time rather than prospect engagement and advancement. The more successful operations havew moved way past that into thoughtful, distinctive multi-media communication.
Posted @ Wednesday, February 01, 2012 1:55 PM by Michael A Brown
Thanks for commenting, Vince. We've seen companies use both DGR and LDR titles, but the definition behind each role has been somewhat inconsistent. That's certainly part of the challenge as the teleprospecting function gets more specialized. Purity of role is certainly a best practice, but as you point out, dedicating reps to an inbound function implies a predictable volume of inquiries. One answer is to keep that inbound team small, and define internal processes that route some inbound inquiries to outbound-focused reps during times of peak volume.
Posted @ Wednesday, February 01, 2012 2:30 PM by Jason Hekl
Thanks for commenting, Michael. I could not agree more. The good news is that there are many examples of companies moving in exactly the direction you advocate.
Posted @ Wednesday, February 01, 2012 3:57 PM by Jason Hekl
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics