Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Browse by Tag

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

The Impact of Inbound Marketing on the Demand Creation Waterfall

  
  
  
  

We've conducted benchmark studies of conversion rates within the demand waterfall for many years; we update this data as market and organizational dynamics change. Historically, the characteristics that have separated best-in-class from average performers have included optimized processes and the use of automation technology; as inbound marketing becomes more important, it too will emerge as a distinguishing characteristic.

The main shift that organizations will discover as they track more inbound activity is how little they know about individuals at initial inquiry stage, prolonging what was previously a short, one-touch step. In a typical outbound inquiry process, an email is sent to a list inviting recipients to take some action (e.g. download white paper, register for a Webcast). The goal is to get the prospect to click a link within the email and fill out a form to receive the content, thus launching the journey to marketing qualified lead (MQL). In the inbound paradigm, an individual might visit the Web site and download ungated content that doesn’t require registration, or interact with company employees through social accounts, all without being identified. In each case, there is a limited amount of information that can be gathered about the individual, which delays the start of the MQL journey. Through cookies and reverse IP lookups, a prospect record can be created that contains a certain amount of potential demographic, firmagraphic and activity data, but this data will only get identification so far. There might be an existing record for this individual within the database, but until they can be matched, two streams of data (one identified, one anonymous) must be maintained. Although a single field of matching information (e.g. a Twitter handle) could be enough to match these records, given the amount of contact data that most companies maintain and the standardized identification criteria that marketing automation platforms typically allow (e.g. email address), this matching can often only be achieved through data management software or an external provider.

The ability to drive more inbound inquiries requires not only rethinking marketing strategy and tactics, but also embracing the reality that early waterfall stages can’t be accurately measured until after deals close. Whether or not organizations proactively adopt a more integrated campaign approach, inbound marketing will blur the delineation between stages at the top of the waterfall. Reputation programs will blend more with demand creation programs meant to drive inquiries; together, they will generate hand-raisers at the waterfall top. At the same time, the MQL stage is becoming compressed for many companies due to inbound responses, because such individuals often quickly self-qualify based on their actions.

Comments

Hi Jonathon,  
 
I would love to see companies flip this around. As you point out, the MQL journey starts later when prospects research and engage anonymously or semi-anonymously. 
 
But is this really that different? Prospects are taking control of more of the buying process today, empowered by the wide availability of information. This has shifted the line, but the real journey starts when interest is created, not when contact details are captured, right?  
 
Looked at that way, today more of the MQL journey happens on your prospects' terms, anonymously or semi-anonymously. As marketers, we now need to enable this anonymous journey, without the benefit of being able to actively drive it using contact details and one-to-one communications. 
 
I would love to hear your thoughts on this. The traditional MQL is being compressed, but is that just because we are using an outdated definition of the journey? 
 
Obviously a thought provoking post, thanks! 
 
-- @wittlake
Posted @ Wednesday, July 06, 2011 2:07 PM by Eric Wittlake
Great post, Jonathan. You bring up a very valid challenge with inbound marketing; a user must voluntarily share contact information at some point.  
 
Our data shows that when companies practice best practices for lead conversion, they can achieve upward of 4% overall visit-to-lead conversion rate on their website. While that's only 4 out of 100 website visitors, it's better than not having that contact info at all. Our top customers convert their visitors to lead at a 7.6% conversion rate. Unfortunately, most businesses aren't following best practices for lead conversion and we see them typically convert < 1%.  
Posted @ Wednesday, July 06, 2011 2:25 PM by Peter Caputa
Eric, thanks for your comment. You're absolutely correct that prospect have taken more control of the buying process. The main point I'm trying to make is that companies need to recognize that they won't know specific individuals/contacts and that they need to embrace anonymity and give more away to attract more interest. But doing this may lessen the amount of folks that qualify but those that do will be of a higher quality. In the end, you're point about becoming enablers of the buyer's journey is critical.
Posted @ Wednesday, July 06, 2011 3:37 PM by Jonathan Block
Excellent data points Peter. Thanks for sharing them!
Posted @ Wednesday, July 06, 2011 3:38 PM by Jonathan Block
Great post, Jonathan. I have to confess that the SiriusDecisions numbers around the impact of inbound...something like 70% expected to come from inbound in the next 5 years?...are daunting, because of the challenges you put forth. For our organization they have really required us to tackle some issues around how we structure our web site and how we analyze and track data from it and how we set expectations around our own waterfall. Tying together the post-hand raise activity to the pre-hand raise activity is not an easy task. 
 
 
 
That said, we routinely see the extent to which inbound activity converts to opportunity, and we need to keep our eye on that prize because, as you say, the MQL stage does get compressed in these situations.  
 
 
 
I would love to see a "part 2" to this post discussing how organizations are successfully tackling the task of populating a record with pre-MQL activity. Do they overlay a BI tool on their marketing automation, web analytics and CRM to tie it all together? Do they integrated CRM with Web analytics (Google analytics in our case)? Eager to see case studies of how this is tackled effectively.
Posted @ Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:38 AM by Amy Bills, Bulldog Solutions
Thanks for the comments Amy. Great idea for a further post. In our experience, there is a technology and process gap in populating records with inbound activity, particularly social. Most organizations track the lead source and, if they're lucky, the interaction that closed the deal. Consequently, few have a handle on their existing marketing mix, to say nothing of adding inbound to the mix. It's definitely a combination of all the technologies you mentioned; however, few organizations have the right tools and processes in place so it's more manual and requires marketers to roll up their sleeves and get analytical.
Posted @ Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:59 AM by Jonathan Block
I guess the good news is I am not missing the secret sauce that everybody else has figured out, right? 
 
 
 
Would love to see more commentary on the challenges you lay out.
Posted @ Friday, July 08, 2011 8:48 AM by Amy Bills
Nice observation on the changes that inbound is having on MQL. I suspect that to minimize lost opportunities, marketers will have to adopt a triage-type process to quickly identify where each buyer is along the journey. 
 
 
 
Also, as buyers come to integrate personal mobile devices and the cloud into their work, identifying and correlating pre- and post-ID activity will only get harder.  
 
 
 
Reading the lines between Peter's stats, companies that build a strong reputation and then offer and promote a constant flow of compelling content stand a better chance of getting visitors to identify themselves early.
Posted @ Friday, July 08, 2011 9:14 AM by Michael Selissen
Great article -- I agree wholeheartedly. B2B marketers will be shifting more from Demand Generation (ads! SEO! list rentals! get people in the door!) and focusing more on Demand Management (how do you drive revenue from the people who have chosen to engage with you in some way shape or form?). Most marketers are not well prepared for this flood of inbound traffic that is already happening. It takes minimal-effort from prospects or customers to engage with a company and its products -- so how do we account for the deluge of lower quality inbound traffic to sift through and seek the conversations that will drive buying decisions? It's getting beyond the standard ideas of scoring, nurturing, and marketing automation, and understanding the unique science of how someone will evaluate your offer.  
 
As always there is no right answer, but I certainly love to see progressive marketers thinking about it! 
Baxter
Posted @ Monday, July 11, 2011 4:38 PM by T. Baxter
Comments have been closed for this article.