Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Browse by Tag

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

The Declining Role Of Microsites

  
  
  
  

In the B2B marketing world microsites have been the workhorse of “adaptive” marketing. Because of their versatility, the ease with which they can be deployed, and their targeted and focused nature, microsites are frequently used both in a marketing organization’s program mix to create original demand and to nurture leads. 

We at SiriusDecisions define a microsite as a dedicated online destination that is deployed to support a specific outbound or inbound marketing initiative. Microsites tend to be separate from the organization’s primary website and often have their own domain name. More robust than single landing pages, microsites consist of a group of web pages (generally fewer than 10) that deliver targeted messages, calls-to action and response mechanisms focused around a central theme.

While the use of microsites is a well-established and beloved tactic, the truth is that most B2B demand creators use (and often over-use) them because their corporate websites are not able to create unique visitor environments through dynamic delivery of content and offers, and marketers often lack the authority and skill sets to drive rapid development projects on the main corporate site.

As B2B organizations increasingly adopt and deploy personalization and website conversion optimization (WCO) technologies and strategies we are seeing microsites used less frequently for several reasons, including:

  • They are less necessary. Relatively recent developments in marketing automation platform (MAP) technologies and web content management (WCM) systems are enabling organizations to optimize their entire primary websites to effectively convert unknown visitors into qualified leads. Marketers who adopt and properly utilize these technologies now have the ability to define rules for dynamic creation of focused and content rich environments on their primary sites based on visit source, visitor behavior and profile data. 
  • The rise of inbound marketing. B2B marketers are increasingly using inbound techniques such as search engine optimization (SEO), search engine marketing (SEM), content syndication, and social media to drive highly targeted visitors to their websites. By their nature, these tactics cast a wider net, become increasingly effective over time and have long lasting effects that make them less palatable for driving visitors to very narrowly focused, isolated and generally transitory microsites. 
  • They are difficult to manage and maintain. While microsites may be relatively easy to build and deploy, overuse of them has created significant challenges for many organizations. As they accumulate they are indexed by search engines, other sites link to them and email and direct mail with links to them linger in inboxes and on desk tops. Marketers must eventually make the decision to either continue to update, track and support them, take them down, or let them sit and stagnate. 
  • They are unnecessarily limiting. Excessive use of microsites is increasingly a symptom of a poorly designed, outdated and inflexible primary site. Why else would one be compelled to create isolated clusters of web pages with unique domain names and little or no navigation to the primary site? Some would argue that the purpose is to create a highly focused and targeted experience to drive desired responses, but that is more effectively accomplished with relevant and compelling messages, offers and content. If your messages and content offers are well constructed your primary site navigation shouldn’t be a distraction. Also, creating an isolated and narrowly focused microsite often serves to limit potential responses. 

While we are beginning to see use of microsites diminish slightly, we don’t expect them to go away any time soon. There remain a variety of valid reasons to use them, but marketers should focus on turning their primary site(s) into conversion optimized destinations so they can be more selective about when to use microsites.

Comments

Jay: 
 
While I appreciate the thought and argument of your post and agree with a lot of it, it is important to go a little deeper on the SEO side of the argument. 
 
Due to the nature of Google's search algorithm it is virtually impossible for any corporation to optimize one large corporate site for the hundreds of keyword phrases they would like to come up for. 
 
The process of optimizing for that many keyword phrases will over-saturate the whole site. 
 
This means that any website or microsite that focuses on just a few competitive keyword phrases and is optimized properly will out perform the large corporate site because the large corporate site is over-saturated. 
 
By a site trying to be all things to everybody it runs the risk of looking like nothing to Google most of the time. 
 
Microsites are the best way to avoid keyword over-saturation and compete with the more targeted websites. If you don't believe me, just look at your Google Webmaster keyword report. It's this report that defines a site's keyword theme in Google's eyes.  
 
Large corporate sites can't make all of their keywords 100% significant on this report. It's this reason that microsites will remain strategically necessary for a long time to come.  
 
@CPollittIU
Posted @ Wednesday, November 24, 2010 9:34 AM by Chad H. Pollitt
Jay, I'm not sure where you're coming from. Let me respond to your 4 claims: 
 
1. They are less necessary because of advances in marketing automation.  
 
Yes. Marketing automation does simplify the creation of content and landing pages. And yes, serving up dynamic content based on a visitor’s PRIOR behavior on your website is powerful (if not big-brother creepy). But marketing automation offers few advantages, if any, in getting FIRST-TIME visitors to your site. See #2. 
 
2. The rise of inbound marketing (SEO and SEM). 
 
I won’t restate the points @CPollittIU (Chad H. Pollitt) made, above, regarding SEO. Chad is right on all of his points. 
 
From a SEM/PPC perspective, microsites offer many advantages. Here are just three: 
 
• AdWords advertisers, for one, have long recognized an ad’s display URL serves as an additional line of ad copy. A custom domain name that includes keywords simply converts better. Better conversion yields better ad positioning, lower CPC and increased ROI. 
 
• Easily test conversion for new landing page designs, especially when doing A/B split-testing. 
 
• Skunkworks unbranded experiments for new product launches, et al. Sometimes I don’t want to associate everything to my current website or brand.  
 
3. They are difficult to manage and maintain.  
 
You are correct about the need for better garbage collection. But then again, as a marketer, I’m willing to bear that burden if I am able to more effectively capture and convert a first-time visitor than my competitor. My sales team has no problem backing me up on this. And if my keyword-centric microsite performs better, what’s the problem? 
 
4. They are unnecessarily limiting.  
 
All good questions, and in the long run, I do agree with you. However, I believe the real problem is not with microsites, but with the failure of marketers to finish their work. Clearly, everything we learn from a microsite (e.g., visitor behavior, keywords, etc.) must be carried to the mothership’s website.  
Posted @ Wednesday, November 24, 2010 11:03 AM by John Fox
"not able to create unique visitor environments through dynamic delivery of content and offers, and marketers often lack the authority and skill sets to drive rapid development projects on the main corporate site" 
 
 
 
Agree! Have you considered digital publications as a way for brand marketers to create 'microsites' in this digital era? I think this is an interesting way to 'tell a story', add interactive media easily and control the flow. All without setting up another site. We just did one for our mobile release. What do you think? http://www.zmags.com/mobile
Posted @ Tuesday, November 30, 2010 8:46 PM by Christina Pappas
Jay, I think you are right on the money. Especially when you say "Excessive use of microsites is increasingly a symptom of a poorly designed, outdated and inflexible primary site. Why else would one be compelled to create isolated clusters of web pages with unique domain names and little or no navigation to the primary site?" 
 
Microsites treat the symptom, but do not cure the disease that is a poorly designed, overly generic "one-size-fits-all" approach to B2B marketing.  
 
Relying on our prospects to self-select their way into a conversion is very risky. We need to do a better job of pushing relevant content to them as early as possible in the visit.
Posted @ Tuesday, December 14, 2010 1:00 PM by Jason Stewart
Jay: 
 
While an interesting point of view, I think you are way off base on many levels. 
 
These are just a few of the ways we are using microsites (and we see overall trends of microsite usage) -  
 
1. Tailoring of Message  
Companies set up marketing automation in support of automated lead nurturing and lead management programs. The promise of these programs is to allow marketers to tailor and target messages by buyer roles, buying stage, industry, issues and sub-topics. Microsites are required as a "front-door" to marketing and communications that is far more capable and effective than a single, corporate web site.  
 
2. Voice to speak to and attract early stage buyers  
We find topical (non-branded) microsites are particularly effective for early stage buyers to engage around a topic -- not talking about your products, services, case studies - not the chest pounding content. But, rather sharing point of view and relevant content on an issue. 
 
3. Target, Target, Target 
Microsites may be used to speak to a specific target account, even a specific individual. Surely you agree that both sales & marketing will see great value in a web destination for one-on-one communications on an account or individual level beyond the corporate web site. Microsites provide a means to communicate in an age where outbound marketing tactics are less and less effective. 
 
Also all of the "objections" that you raise have counter-points -- without taking too much time 1) microsites support and don't work against inbound marketing efforts, 2) don't need to be difficult to maintain, and 3) should work with and not against other marketing efforts.
Posted @ Saturday, January 01, 2011 3:53 PM by Zak Pines
Comments have been closed for this article.